Afraid of falling behind, businesses are rushing to implement AI – even if their industries might not be ready for it. In this Standard Time episode, we explore generative AI’s impact on media and journalism, and ask whether its making us smarter or dumber.
What are we talking about when we refer to AI? Chat GPT? Deep fake pictures? Google’s Gemini?
According to Forbes there are 2 forms of AI, the first one being ‘narrow’ or ‘weak’ AI (sorry AI it’s not personal), that ‘focuses on performing a specific task intelligently’. Then we have generative AI that can create something new from the piece of information you gave it. It’s like an imaginative friend who can come up with original, creative content.
Who started this mess?. The father of AI, is called Geoffrey Hinton. In an interview on the CBS programme 60 minutes, Hinton helped make some stark comments about AI, including the fact that humanity doesn’t really know what it actually does.
But what do we know about AI? It does learn faster than humans, over the span of a few days, AI can process and learn as much information as a child does in 20 years.
But this learning process is far from ideal. AI can absorb all data from humanity’s online repositories but it still doesn’t have the self-awareness of a two-year old yet. Although, this is something that most likely will develop over time.
You can also listen to the Standard Time talk show in a podcast format on the Cultural Broadcasting Archive – or wherever you get your podcasts.
So who brought forward this AI boom? Why is everybody implementing it?
Companies are afraid of falling behind and commences AI implementation as fast as possible, despite the fact that their industries might not be ready for it.
‘AI snake oil is appealing to broken institutions. So when you have an institution that is unable to function as it should, for example when it is overloaded like in the HR department, you have 1000 of applicants for a job, so for that type of institution for an HR person that is put in this position, it’s really easy to say I let AI sort out who the top 10 applicants are and just interview them”
In this episode we try to dig deep into AI’s impact on media and journalism, an industry that might be far from being ready. We talk about the good, the bad and the ugly with our esteemed guests.
Guests
Luka Lisjak Gabrijecic is an editor of Eurozine partner journal Razpotjais Slovenian historian, political analyst, essayist and translator. He is also a part of the Eurozine Editorial Board.
Miriam Rasch is a writer and philosopher, who publishes about ethics of technology, media and literature. She works as research educator at the Willem de Kooning Academy in Rotterdam, The Netherlands, and a part of the Eurozine editorial board.
Creative team
Réka Kinga Papp, anchor
Daniela Univazo, writer-editor
Merve Akyel, art director, Eurozine
Szilvia Pintér, producer
Priyanka Hutschenreiter, project manager
Julia Sobota, captions and translations
Zsófia Gabriella Papp, digital producer
Nóra Ruszkai, video editor István Nagy, lead video editor Milán Golovics, dialogue editor
Art
Victor Maria Lima, animation Crypt-of-Insomnia, theme music
Disclosure
This talk show is a Display Europe production: a ground-breaking media platform anchored in public values.
This programme is co-funded by the Creative Europe Programme of the European Union and the European Cultural Foundation.
Importantly, the views and opinions expressed here are those of the authors and speakers only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). Neither the European Union nor the EACEA can be held responsible for them.
Published 28 November 2024
Original in English
First published by Eurozine
After over 20 years of publishing for free, Eurozine needs your support to get through an exceptionally lean year.
Become a Patron and get exciting perks for your help!
Want to hear a human voice? Listen and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.
Are robots replacing us? For translators, this prospect is quite realistic. Though machine translation can be useful with simple and direct text, it still has a lot to catch up on to eliminate language barriers and understand subtle meanings. Publishing across languages on today’s Standard Time episode.
From regular TV coverage to constant online streaming, war imagery is so profuse it makes for compulsive viewing that appears to have already reached a pinnacle of disassociation. Meanwhile, the imaging technologies behind war have developed to the point of supposedly ‘predicting’ violence, threatening to occupy the future. And what is left of the real world in their wake?