Once again, the age-old prejudice is rising in Europe and producing new mutations. In this episode of Standard Time, we discuss how to tell criticism from hate.
The public discourse on Palestine and Israel has grown extremely tense all across Europe, and tinted with local political tropes. This has been the case for decades, but since the recent escalation of violence from October 2023, the debate has erupted with new fervour.
It would be foolish to suggest that we can do justice to this highly complex, ongoing conflict in a half-hour talk show. What we can do, however, is to inspect the underlying reasons why these discussions are so charged, and why they seem to go in circles.
Antisemitism and anti-Muslim racism form a double helix across European history and have been used as political tools to galvanize fragmented societies against a shared enemy. Today we take a look at one part: Antisemitism, and in our next episode we will deal with anti-Muslim racism.
You can also listen to the Standard Time talk show in a podcast format on the Cultural Broadcasting Archive – or wherever you get your podcasts.
The origins of Antisemitism
Antisemitism has taken so many shapes and forms in the past two thousand years. It has transformed from the Christian propaganda of John Chrysostom, or John the Golden Mouth in the 4th century, through the fervent Antisemitism of the religious reformer Martin Luther, through the political, social and economic Antisemitism of the early modern times into the racial ideology of the XX. century. The European history of Antisemitism is long and dark, and we recommend further reads below for more insight on the matter.
Many of us were taught that after the unprecedented horrors of the Holocaust, Europe has vowed to “never again” allow for such hate to build up that has led to this egregious industrialized genocide. Indeed, there have been great efforts to uproot this nasty prejudice, but it never disappeared entirely. And in recent years there is a significant rise in covert, dog whistle-style propaganda, and in outright hate rhetoric across the continent.
The definition is itself a political problem
The ongoing conflict of Palestine and Israel has sparked yet another wave of Antisemitic as well as Anti-muslim racism which infect the debate.
In 2002, the European Union together with the OSCE, attempted to formulate a joint definition of the word, later adopted by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance, which reads: ‘Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of Antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities’.
But does that mean that a criticism of Israel’s for the aggression on Gaza is Antisemitic?
In IHRA’s online resources on Antisemitism, one can read about the role of the Israeli state in the antisemitic ideology: ‘Manifestations [of Antisemitism] might include the targeting of the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. However, criticism of Israel similar to that levelled against any other country cannot be regarded as Antisemitic.’
Criticizing the Israeli state’s actions has become difficult to navigate, and it polarizes Europeans. How can one tell hate from criticism? Today’s speakers offer some guidance, discussing where Antisemitism stands today and how it has transformed in the 21st century.
Guests
Professor Helga Embacher is a historian at the University of Salzburg with a focus on National Socialism, Jewish history, Israel, and Antisemitism.
Johann Kneihs has been working in journalism since 1980 for the past few years and is also active in the programming of two music festivals in Austria, Glatt&Verkehrt and the newly created festival Jewish Weekends in St. Pölten.
Lidia Zessin-Jurek is an Assistant Professor of Holocaust and Genocide Studies at Stockton University. She’s a Polish historian and author, currently working in New Jersey. Her research spans the memory of the Holocaust and the Gulag, as well as forced migration and refugee movements in historical and contemporary contexts.
Senad Hergić, producer
Leah Hochedlinger, video recording
Marlena Stolze, video recording
Clemens Schmiedbauer, video recording
Richard Brusek, sound recording
Postproduction
Milán Golovics, dialogue editor
Dániel Nagy, dialogue editor
Nóra Ruszkai, video editor
István Nagy, post production
Art
Victor Maria Lima, animation
Music by Crypt-of-Insomnia
Captions and subtitles
Julia Sobota closed captions, Polish and French subtitles; language versions management
Farah Ayyash Arabic subtitles
Mia Belén Soriano Spanish subtitles
Marta Ferdebar Croatian subtitles
Lídia Nádori German subtitles
Katalin Szlukovényi Hungarian subtitles
Olena Yermakova Ukrainian subtitles
Aida Yermekbayeva Russian subtitles
Hosted by
The Alte Schmiede Kunstverein, Vienna
Disclosure
This talk show is a Display Europe production: a ground-breaking media platform anchored in public values.
This programme is co-funded by the Creative Europe Programme of the European Union and the European Cultural Foundation.
Importantly, the views and opinions expressed here are those of the authors and speakers only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). Neither the European Union nor the EACEA can be held responsible for them.
After over 20 years of publishing for free, Eurozine needs your support to get through an exceptionally lean year.
Become a Patron and get exciting perks for your help!
Want to hear a human voice? Listen and subscribe wherever you get your podcasts.
Although incoming migrants are demonized in political discourse, many European countries are struggling with a loss of population. In this episode of Standard Time, Eurozine’s colleagues talk about the idea of ethnic purity, outmigration, and finding a sense of belonging.
Trying to predict Donald Trump’s second-round presidential moves can be nerve racking. Media, having already backed out of supporting the Democrats, look set to hedge their bets further. Surviving the roller coaster once might be reassuring, but progressives are reflecting on historical grassroots action for overcoming internal attacks on democracy.