Solidarity with Belarus

Physical fear and the dread of disappointment have been the dominant emotions whenever elections have come around in Belarus in the past two-and-a-half decades. This time is no different. And yet something has changed.

When the editors of the Belarusian literary magazine Dziejaslou offered Eurozine rights to an interview with Svetlana Alexievich that they had published in their 100th issue last year, we immediately said yes. Not only because Alexievich is Alexievich and a Nobel laureate. But also, because we wanted to hear what she had to say to an audience in her native Belarus – and not just any audience, but to readers of one of the country’s most important independent cultural and literary journals.

In Belarus, Alexievich is treated with a reverence reserved only for two other national writers before her: Alieś Adamovič and Vasiĺ Bykaŭ. This is not because she has styled herself as symbol of political resistance. Rather, it is because her deeply humanist vision, like that of her forebears, transcends the everyday political circumstances that so many people in the country experience as a humiliation.

Some readers of the interview may find it uncomfortable that she thinks the time has passed for a lustration process in Belarus. But when Alexievich pleas for understanding the ‘cultural and mental components’ of the situation, she is certainly not making excuses for the past or turning a blind eye to the present.

Comparing the generation that came of age under Lukashenka with her own, she observes that ‘their aspirations are different. They’re more concerned about their private lives’. Until recently, this has been true for all but a small group of progressive, liberal-minded activists and journalists. As Ingo Petz observes in his in-depth piece on Belarus’s delayed political awakening, the nationalism of a generation politicized by Kurapaty and Chernobyl was, for the generation that came after, a throwback – and one that could get you into trouble.

Physical fear and the dread of disappointment have been the dominant emotions whenever elections have come around in Belarus in the past two-and-a-half decades. With more than 40 journalists detained over the past ten weeks, that is still the case this time. And yet something has changed. The fact that the opposition candidate Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya has been attracting massive crowds not just in Minsk and other cities, but also in the provinces, is the best evidence that Lukashenka’s repressive social contract – as Petz calls it – is losing its hold. All that we can hope for on 9 August is that there will be no bloodshed.

For something quite different: do take time to read historian Kate Brown’s brilliant essay ‘Resurrecting the soil’, contributed by the Estonian cultural magazine Vikerkaar. Brown blends her account of an urban gardening project in Washington DC with a history of colonialism, two world wars and industrial chemistry – and concludes with a strategy for the Anthropocene. Gardeners have always been credited with higher wisdom: this confirms it.

This editorial is part of our 14/2020 newsletter. Subscribe to get the weekly updates about our latest publications and reviews of our partner journals.

Published 5 August 2020
Original in English
First published by Eurozine

© Eurozine

PDF/PRINT
Photo by Marco Fieber from Flickr Adaption: Eurozine logo has been placed over the image.

Share article

Newsletter

Subscribe to know what’s worth thinking about.

Related Articles

Cover for: On the dark side of history

Three years after the mass anti-regime protests in Belarus, the pro-Russian state continues to brutally repress all expressions of national identity. But people have not forgotten their experiences in 2020 and believe that Belarus’s long history of foreign rule is nearing its end.

Cover for: Strength in caring

Despite divisive nationalist politics, there are those who manage to overcome the odds, forming meaningful acts of solidarity. Eurozine’s new focal point ‘The world in pieces’ looks critically at what divides, tackling the complexities of destablized identity.

Discussion