On shields and death traps
Photo by European Parliament © European Union 2016 – European Parliament.
Let’s cast our minds back a month and a half. In early March, Ursula Von der Leyen travelled to the region and declared Greece to be ‘Europe’s shield’. But belligerent rhetoric and ramping up Frontex were obviously not going to be enough. Those who understood the situation knew that there was no way around Erdoğan, however cynical his tactics.
The EU–Turkey deal agreed in March 2016 was effective only on the face of it. For reasons unconnected to the refugee situation, the EU chose not to keep its side of the deal – including reanimating the accession process, modernizing the customs union and liberalizing visa obligations. For an EU operating under permanent crisis mode, a refugee problem out of sight was a refugee problem out of mind.
With Turkey being drawn ever further into the Syrian conflict, it was only a matter of time before Erdoğan would cash in his chips. Even though the arrangement with Turkey was clearly unsustainable, differences between member states on relocation policy remained intractable.
After Nea Dimokratia took over from Syriza in Greece in July 2019, conditions in the camps in the Aegean became steadily worse. In the first months of this year, protests against preparations for new refugee facilities turned violent on all sides. Golden Dawn was said to have been involved, but the reaction was more than just a far-right phenomenon. When Erdoğan sent refugees over the Evros in early March, it looked as if Europe was on the brink of another refugee crisis. It might still be – but not of the kind we expected.
The risk of coronavirus outbreaks in the camps is immediate. As Artemis Fyssa and Bilgin Ayata report, sanitary conditions are desperate and overcrowding is severe. In the hotspot in Samos, over 7000 refugees live in a camp built for 650. Compounding the situation is the massive underfunding of public health facilities on the islands: Chios’s hospital does not have a single intensive care unit bed.
To its credit, the EU has taken steps in the right direction. On the urging of the Parliament, the Commissioner for Home Affairs has called on the Greek government to evacuate the most vulnerable. But this won’t be enough. What is needed is a full-scale evacuation of residents into the empty hotels around the islands, where social distancing would be possible.
This won’t happen, of course. Instead, the Greek government will continue to use European funds to push forward with the securitization of the refugee camps. It will continue to impose even greater restrictions on residents’ movements and to segregate them even more rigidly from the rest of the population. ‘If this politics of abandonment continues,’ write Ayata and Fyssa, ‘overcrowded camps will become death traps.’
If talk of shields was jarring before coronavirus, it could very soon become grotesque.
This editorial is part of our 7/2020 newsletter. Subscribe to get the weekly updates about our latest publications and reviews of our partner journals.
Published 16 April 2020
Original in English
First published by Eurozine
© Eurozine
PDF/PRINTIn focal points
Invest in insight!
After over 20 years of publishing for free, Eurozine needs your support to get through an exceptionally lean year.
Become a Patron and get exciting perks for your help!
Want to hear a human voice?
Listen and subscribe wherever
you get your podcasts.
Newsletter
Subscribe to know what’s worth thinking about.
Related Articles
In the 1990s, Ukraine again became one of the world’s leading grain exporters after decades of Soviet agricultural mismanagement. It retains this status despite the major disruptions to the European grain market caused by the war.
Ongoing instability, due to conflict, environmental crises and economic hardship in parts of Africa, forces many to migrate. Those who make it to Tunisia’s borders face state violence and informal trading. Can the EU’s failing cash for immobility plan be anything more than legitimization of Tunisia’s authoritarian regime and Italy’s perilous politicization of immigration?